TrainingWorth uses the public bulk export from the U.S. Department of Labor’s TrainingProviderResults.gov. The downloaded file was last modified April 29, 2026. It has no field identifying the outcome cohort year, so that file date must not be read as the year when participants trained or earned wages. We are independent and do not represent the Department of Labor.
What appears on the site
We publish a program profile only when the export reports a provider, location, program website, tuition, duration, at least 25 program exits, completion counts, at least 25 people eligible for employment follow-up, at least 10 employed in the second quarter after exit, and a median second-quarter earnings figure. We hold extreme reported values for review and omit listings when an official source says a program ended or when current evidence conflicts with the historical listing’s location or status. A state comparison appears only with at least three qualifying programs from two providers; a city comparison also requires three programs from two providers. This strict filter means the site does not list every school or every approved program.
Costs and outcomes
Tuition and fees are the reported out-of-pocket amount for a participant who is not funded through WIOA. Books and supplies are separate when reported. The reported combined amount adds those two source fields only when both are available; it may exclude other charges. These amounts may have changed; ask the provider for a current written quote.
Completion is reported completions divided by program exits. Employment after exit is the number employed in the second quarter after exit divided by the number eligible for that follow-up measure. That denominator is not necessarily the same as total exits. Median earnings are earnings during the second quarter after exit among employed participants. They are not annual pay or a forecast of your earnings.
What the data cannot establish
Outcomes describe past groups. They do not establish that a program caused a particular result or guarantee admission, funding, completion, employment, wages, or current eligibility. Some providers report identical outcome counts and earnings for different program listings. We flag those profiles because the people behind the figures may overlap; the export does not let us confirm whether the groups are independent. Do not add their counts together. Some values are suppressed by the source because of small groups, missing reporting, or quality concerns. We never treat a suppressed value as zero. The export’s date is not proof that every provider’s cost or schedule was checked on that day.
Local comparisons
We verify city names against the 2026 Census places gazetteer. A local comparison includes qualifying programs whose reported coordinates fall within 30 straight-line miles of the Census place point, in the same state. This is not travel distance. We withhold malformed or implausibly distant coordinates. We include major cities with at least 100,000 people in the Census 2025 place estimates when at least three qualifying programs from two providers are nearby and the nearest is within 15 straight-line miles. When nearby cities have exactly the same set of programs, we publish the comparison under the larger city instead of duplicating pages. Population helps choose the anchor; it is not a search-volume estimate.
Occupational wage context
Some city comparisons include May 2025 metro occupational wages from the Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS). We show the named BLS metro area only where the comparison city is the metro area’s first named city, the primary state matches, and BLS reports a detailed occupation’s annual median wage and estimated employment. We omit the panel when this conservative match fails or when one training category spans distinct occupations. The BLS metro covers a different area from our 30-mile program search. Its median wage describes workers in one related occupation, regardless of where they trained; a program may lead to other jobs, and estimated employment is not job openings. Neither measure is a program outcome or a prediction for a new graduate. Do not compare annual BLS wages directly with the Department of Labor’s second-quarter-after-exit earnings.
Classification and updates
We group programs using exact Classification of Instructional Programs (CIP) codes plus a matching program title or credential. We exclude related but different qualifications, refresher courses, and broad programs that do not answer the category's training question. The reported occupation code alone does not qualify a listing. We label source listings that clearly describe a CDL endorsement add-on. They remain visible, but local full-course tuition ranges, charts, and lowest-cost claims exclude them because an endorsement price does not represent an initial CDL course. Records with conflicting duplicate identities are withheld from published profiles. Provider links come from the export and can point to archived catalogs or unrelated sites; an HTTP success response is not proof of current availability. We manually review replacement provider pages and show any newer address or duration separately from federal figures. We retain source files, checksums, and import reports for each refresh. Read the official data dictionary for field definitions. To report a correction, use our contact page.
California CNA directory checks
Our searchable California CNA directory consolidates 570 rows from the California Department of Public Health’s public list into 508 distinct provider-and-address entries. We withheld one administrative mailbox row. Where repeated source rows disagree on ZIP or phone, we omit that field from the merged entry. The directory is a dated snapshot, not a check of open enrollment or active status.
For 19 California nursing-assistant profiles, we found a matching city and full street address in that list on September 27, 2026. Each profile names the directory business and address alongside the historical federal listing. A location match does not verify that its current course is identical to the older federal record, that enrollment is open, or that its status remains active today. A profile without a match is not proof that the provider is absent from CDPH records; addresses and business names can change, and our check covers only this directory.
Florida nursing programs and NCLEX data
Our RN and practical nursing directories reproduce 506 current-program rows from Florida’s MQA nursing compare portal, retrieved September 27, 2026. The portal says it refreshes nightly, includes approved, accredited, and probationary programs, and excludes terminated or closed programs. Our snapshot may lag a status change; always open the live state detail. One listed program has an Indiana address and is identified as an out-of-state listing, not a Florida campus.
Individual NCLEX pages are published for 265 Florida-address programs with one usable 2025 cumulative score and at least three distinct usable annual scores from 2021–2025. We omit ambiguous duplicate reporting years from trends. When the portal prints 0% while all four quarters say “No Testers,” we treat the annual result as unavailable; an impossible rate above 100% and an invalid year label are also withheld. The raw source HTML, detail checksums, and those quality flags are retained in our data workflow. We display 2026 as a partial year.
The interactive portal does not publish candidate counts beside its percentages. Florida separately publishes a 2025 first-time NCLEX-RN report and NCLEX-PN report with program-level delivered and passed counts. We match their NCSBN code to the exact Florida program license, validate the report arithmetic, and display the count beside a portal rate only when the two sources agree within one decimal place. 244 of our 265 NCLEX profiles meet that count-match gate. When the year-end report and the portal disagree, the profile labels both rates separately and links to the report; missing counts remain unavailable rather than zero. Candidate counts show the size of a first-time exam group, not a program’s class size or graduate total. We do not rank programs by pass rate. Florida program numbers, statuses, and NCLEX results are separate from the older federal tuition and employment profiles; we have not joined records by similar school names. A state listing is not a promise of open enrollment, and Florida notes that some programs may need separate Commission for Independent Education licensure.
For 2021–2024, we also parse Florida’s public year-end RN and PN reports. Some program tables run onto a second PDF page; the importer carries the same exact license code to its printed total and checks that quarter counts sum to the year. Each historical table cell links to its own year’s report page. A count appears only when the report rate and the portal’s rate for that license and year agree within rounding. A conflicting rate is labeled “Sources differ” with the report linked, and an absent or zero-candidate row is labeled unverified. These older reports are dated snapshots; Florida warns that its interactive and PDF figures can differ after reconciliation. A first-time candidate count is not enrollment, class size, or the number of graduates.
Use these comparisons as a starting point and verify current details before enrolling. Our Terms of Use explain the limits of this research site.